JUST CAME ACROSS A GREAT ARTICLE ON THE ECONOMICS OF BREAST CANCER—INCLUDING INFO ON THE BENEFITS OF THERMOGRAPHY OVER MAMMOGRAPHY–LOTS OF GREAT INFO ON BREAST CANCER IN GENERAL. CHECK IT OUT! http://www.sedonaobserver.com/SO_001/BreastCancerUpdate.htm
I wrote this entry back in October of 2008 ( and it has been one of my most popular entries), and in light of recent recommendations as to when and how often women should get breast cancer screenings, I thought I would revisit the positive aspects of thermography vs. mammography. New recommendations are that women get yearly mammograms at the age of 50 rather than 40, and that they get a mammogram every other year instead of every year. The reason given is that there have been too many false positives when women get yearly mammograms starting at age forty. This results in unneeded and expensive biopsies and surgeries. Thermography is the perfect solution. As stated in the following information, thermography is able to detect cancer in the earliest stages of autogenesis (blood vessel formation that is a precursor of cancerous tumors)…..up to two years before a tumor even forms. So that means that yearly thermographies would not be needed. And with thermography, breast density is not an issue as it is in mammography. No need to painfully compress the breast to get an accurate reading…. and less chance that the test will have to be repeated if the compression was not sufficient to get a clear picture ( more radiation!!) So, in my mind, the question is not when or how often should women be getting mammograms. The question I have is why any woman would EVER get a mammogram at all! Sure didn’t hear that on the morning news shows now did ya? Makes you wonder…….
Here are some facts about MAMMOGRAPHY that you may not know:
Screening mammography provides about 1,000 times greater radiation exposure than from a chest x-ray, which in itself poses a risk of cancer.
Mammography compresses your breasts tightly, and often painfully, which could lead to a lethal spread of cancerous cells, should they exist.
“The premenopausal breast is highly sensitive to radiation, each 1 rad exposure increasing breast cancer risk by about 1 percent, with a cumulative 10 percent increased risk for each breast over a decade’s screening,” points out Dr. Samuel Epstein, one of the top cancer experts.
Dr. Charles B. Simone, a former clinical associate in immunology and pharmacology at the National Cancer Institute, said, “Mammograms increase the risk for developing breast cancer and raise the risk of spreading or metastasizing an existing growth.”
Most physicians continue to recommend mammograms for fear of being sued by a woman who develops breast cancer after he did not advise her to get one.
The technology carries a first-time false positive rate of up to 6 percent. False positives can lead to expensive repeat screenings and can sometimes result in unnecessary invasive procedures including biopsies and surgeries.
But, breast cancer is the leading cancer in women and is a real issue. So what is a woman to do?
When I turned 40 I went for my first mammogram on the advice of my doctor. This was to establish a baseline for comparison with future mammograms. Then like a good girl I went for another mammogram the next year and again the following year. While this last mammogram was being done, I knew that the technician did not know what she was doing. A mammogram involves intense compression of the breast and this is not what I felt. So I was not surprised, but was a little unsettled, when I received a letter in the mail a few days later saying that “suspicious areas” were found in both breasts and I should have the test repeated. Well. If this were my first mammogram, I would have freaked out and would have been convinced that I had cancer in both breasts. But, because I believed that this particular test was not done correctly, I knew that it simply needed to be repeated. So I subjected myself to the unnecessary radiation exposure just to be sure. And as I suspected, the technician who read the second test results and compared them to the first, said that the first mammogram was not done correctly. I am now 57 years old and I have not had a mammogram in the past 15 years. Let me say that I have no history of breast or any other form of cancer in my family. If I did, I would not be as cavalier as I have been. The fact is that the risk of breast cancer has been increasing over the years. Not surprising. The nasty toxins in our food … our cosmetics ….our beauty care products… and air we breath, are concentrated in fat cells, and fat cells make up the bulk of the breast. I could write pages on things you can do to lessen your breast cancer risk….and there are many. But the purpose of this blog posting is to encourage you to look into alternatives to mammography. Breast awareness…that is awareness to any changes whatsoever in your breast is one way. Regular self breast exams are another. You know your body…or you should. Don’t let recent studies that say breast self exams are useless mislead you. Mammography is a BIG money maker after all. But most importantly, there is a new option for breast screening called thermographic breast screening or THERMOGRAPHY. Thermography uses no mechanical pressure or ionizing radiation, and can detect signs of breast cancer years earlier than either mammography or a physical exam. It measures the radiation of infrared heat from your body and translates this information into anatomical images. Thermography is able to detect the possibility of breast cancer much earlier, because it can image the early stages of angiogenesis (the formation of a direct supply of blood to cancer cells, which is a necessary step before they can grow into tumors of size).
Thermography clinics can be found in 33 states and will hopefully be the wave of the future. So, please…..educate yourself and think for yourself and consider safer, more effective alternatives to mammograms.












